Demonstrators protest Condoleezza Rice’s trip to Australia

Thursday, March 16, 2006

Anti-war demonstrators in Sydney, Australia on Thursday dubbed U.S. Secretary of State Dr Condoleezza Rice a “war criminal” and “murderer.” Two protesters were evicted and five people were arrested during protests against the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq.

Dr Rice, on a three-day trip to Australia, said she understood why people found it hard to be positive about Iraq when all they saw on their television screens was violence.

Soon after Rice began her speech at the University of Sydney’s Conservatorium of Music, two protesters shouted from the rear of the auditorium, “Condoleezza Rice, you are a war criminal,” and “Iraqi blood is on your hands and you cannot wash that blood away.” Standing with their palms towards her, the young man and woman repeated their accusation until security intervened to remove them from the hall.

About 15 minutes into Rice’s address, a third protester appeared at a balcony door, interrupting her speech as she referred to freedom. “What kind of freedom are you talking about? You are a murderer,” said the demonstrator before he was quietly escorted from the hall. “I’m very glad to see that democracy is well and alive here at the university,” she said.

In her speech, Rice sought to justify the U.S. occupation of Iraq, describing Iraqis as now more free. One student asked about abuses committed by U.S. forces at the Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq. She said the abuses had made her “sick to her stomach.” However, she defended Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, where human rights groups say detainees are held in inhumane conditions and in detention flouting international laws.

Before Rice began her speech, about 50 protesters were gathered at the front gates of the Conservatorium. The group were confronted by police on horseback and by police dogs. Police used the horses to charge into the group of activists and push them back, as a police helicopter hovered.

A police spokeswoman said the group was blocking pedestrian access to the building and that police had spent more than 20 minutes warning them to move. The police then moved in and pushed the crowd back 20 metres. Police say five people have been charged with “hindering police in the execution of their duties.”

The “Stop the War Coalition” says Rice is a “war criminal” and is not welcome in Australia. The group’s spokeswoman, Anna Samson, says the protest is one of many planned in the lead-up to the third anniversary of the invasion and occupation of Iraq on March 20.

Paddy Gibson, from the University of Sydney’s Student’s Council, says the protest is in opposition to the Iraq war, and to the use of the University of Sydney’s campus to host Rice, “the most powerful woman in the world,” who they say is a war criminal. “They’re saying, ‘… you’ve got Sydney Uni’s support to stand up and peddle your murderous hate speeches,’ which is what we see it,” he said.

“You’ve got 180,000 people killed, as we said, for no other reason than strategic control of the region’s oil resources. And the anti-Muslim racism that’s been whipped up to justify this war is being felt by Sydney University students,” said Mr Gibson.

Ontario Votes 2007: Interview with Family Coalition Party candidate Kristen Monster, Willowdale

Wednesday, October 3, 2007

Kristen Monster is running for the Family Coalition Party in the Ontario provincial election, in the Willowdale riding. Wikinews’ Nick Moreau interviewed her regarding her values, her experience, and her campaign.

Stay tuned for further interviews; every candidate from every party is eligible, and will be contacted. Expect interviews from Liberals, Progressive Conservatives, New Democratic Party members, Ontario Greens, as well as members from the Family Coalition, Freedom, Communist, Libertarian, and Confederation of Regions parties, as well as independents.

Photography By Means Of The Ages}

Photography By Means of The Ages

by

bassThese days photography could not be more different. In the movies, we utilized to be astonished when spies had cameras in their watches or the soles of their sneakers. But now it is typical for virtually absolutely everyone to have a camera in their mobile phone and to be in a position to pull it out and snap a photo virtually anyplace.Let fill in a few gaps. We can go back to the origins of the language to find that the word photography started in the Greek instances and it actually implies drawing with light. But the actual science of photography did not genuinely get off until the 1800’s in this nation when a fellow by the title of John Hershel utilized the phrases photography, positives and negatives to the activity of producing images. We had negatives of our pictures from then until the dawn of digital photography in the last couple of many years.For most of us, though, the company Eastman Kodak is almost certainly the one particular we associate most with the early developments of photography. And it was the early pioneer of photography, George Eastman that manufactured the very first developments on the primitive techniques becoming utilized till his operate in 1839. A tiny trivia? Eastman made the name Kodak up because he wanted his business name to begin with a K.The developments started to come along rather routinely as photography started to mature and turn out to be more sophisticated. Colour photography was designed in 1861 by a scientist named James Clark Maxwell. Up until then, all images have been black and white or monochrome. Color photography was a massive leap forward but it genuinely did not start off to move into the public arena until two brothers named Lumi&egravere in 1907 invented the color plate.More than the decades to comply with, photography moved forward steadily and moved out of the planet of science and then journalism and into each of our residences. But the revolution that has turned photography into what we know it to have nowadays occurred in 1981 when Sony invented the initial camera that worked without having film. The digital age was upon us.It was Kodak that yet again acquired the lead in the marketplace by obtaining the first digital camera out on the market in 1990 when they developed the Kodak DCS a hundred. As with all technology, early digital cameras had been large (by these days specifications) and a lot far more expensive than we are utilized to now. Innovation in the area of photography has continued to march practically as quick as people could keep up. When digital cameras have been presented that gave us a port to be able to download them to our personal computers, the internet explosion of imagery was fueled. Further development coming virtually every 12 months since 1990 incorporated the speedy and phenomenal expansion of memory in digital cameras along with the idea of swappable storage drives. This altered the way men and women took photos since now the quantity of photographs a person could take was virtually limitless. The growth of memory also gave developers the capability to add video capture to the same gadgets as have been utilized for photography so that practically anybody could become a cameraman with that tiny camera that could by this time match in their shirt pocket. Much of the excitement of world wide web websites like YouTube can be attributed to the capability of the regular citizen to take video anyplace, anytime and at no cost to them. The photography and video sector have had to do a whole lot of adjusting to discover how to service this marketplace that was altering at speeds unimaginable by George Eastman a century just before. The affordable availability of good quality color printers that enabled men and women to print their pictures at the property was a boon to the amateur camera buff but a blow to the photography business.But to their credit, the industry has kept up. But we can be positive that the developments are just acquiring underway. Who understands what new technical wizardry is ahead for the photography world. It is certain to be an exciting trip, no matter what the potential holds.

K Jackson takes a look at The Walking Dead cast 8×10 reprint signed photo by 15 inc. Lincoln + check out Amazon link: http://amzn.to/2E8JINT

Article Source:

eArticlesOnline.com}

BDSM as business: An interview with the owners of a dungeon

Sunday, October 21, 2007

Torture proliferates American headlines today: whether its use is defensible in certain contexts and the morality of the practice. Wikinews reporter David Shankbone was curious about torture in American popular culture. This is the first of a two part series examining the BDSM business. This interview focuses on the owners of a dungeon, what they charge, what the clients are like and how they handle their needs.

When Shankbone rings the bell of “HC & Co.” he has no idea what to expect. A BDSM (Bondage Discipline Sadism Masochism) dungeon is a legal enterprise in New York City, and there are more than a few businesses that cater to a clientèle that wants an enema, a spanking, to be dressed like a baby or to wear women’s clothing. Shankbone went to find out what these businesses are like, who runs them, who works at them, and who frequents them. He spent three hours one night in what is considered one of the more upscale establishments in Manhattan, Rebecca’s Hidden Chamber, where according to The Village Voice, “you can take your girlfriend or wife, and have them treated with respect—unless they hope to be treated with something other than respect!”

When Shankbone arrived on the sixth floor of a midtown office building, the elevator opened up to a hallway where a smiling Rebecca greeted him. She is a beautiful forty-ish Long Island mother of three who is dressed in smart black pants and a black turtleneck that reaches up to her blond-streaked hair pulled back in a bushy ponytail. “Are you David Shankbone? We’re so excited to meet you!” she says, and leads him down the hall to a living room area with a sofa, a television playing an action-thriller, an open supply cabinet stocked with enema kits, and her husband Bill sitting at the computer trying to find where the re-release of Blade Runner is playing at the local theater. “I don’t like that movie,” says Rebecca.

Perhaps the most poignant moment came at the end of the night when Shankbone was waiting to be escorted out (to avoid running into a client). Rebecca came into the room and sat on the sofa. “You know, a lot of people out there would like to see me burn for what I do,” she says. Rebecca is a woman who has faced challenges in her life, and dealt with them the best she could given her circumstances. She sees herself as providing a service to people who have needs, no matter how debauched the outside world deems them. They sat talking mutual challenges they have faced and politics (she’s supporting Hillary); Rebecca reflected upon the irony that many of the people who supported the torture at Abu Ghraib would want her closed down. It was in this conversation that Shankbone saw that humanity can be found anywhere, including in places that appear on the surface to cater to the inhumanity some people in our society feel towards themselves, or others.

“The best way to describe it,” says Bill, “is if you had a kink, and you had a wife and you had two kids, and every time you had sex with your wife it just didn’t hit the nail on the head. What would you do about it? How would you handle it? You might go through life feeling unfulfilled. Or you might say, ‘No, my kink is I really need to dress in women’s clothing.’ We’re that outlet. We’re not the evil devil out here, plucking people off the street, keeping them chained up for days on end.”

Below is David Shankbone’s interview with Bill & Rebecca, owners of Rebecca’s Hidden Chamber, a BDSM dungeon.

Contents

  • 1 Meet Bill & Rebecca, owners of a BDSM dungeon
    • 1.1 Their home life
  • 2 Operating the business
    • 2.1 The costs
    • 2.2 Hiring employees
    • 2.3 The prices
  • 3 The clients
    • 3.1 What happens when a client walks through the door
    • 3.2 Motivations of the clients
    • 3.3 Typical requests
    • 3.4 What is not typical
  • 4 The environment
    • 4.1 Is an S&M dungeon dangerous?
    • 4.2 On S&M burnout
  • 5 Criticism of BDSM
  • 6 Related news
  • 7 External links
  • 8 Sources

George H. W. Bush to attend Sydney CEO conference

 Correction — August 29, 2005 See Bush attendance at Australia CEO conference a hoax

Thursday, August 25, 2005

It was revealed today that George H. W. Bush will be attending the Forbes Global CEO Conference in Sydney next week. Mr. Bush is a wealthy businessman and member of Skull and Bones. He has also been President of the United States and the head of the CIA, and is the father of the current US President George W. Bush.

The conference will be held at the Sydney Opera House. The Forbes website says that at the event “senior figures from the world’s leading companies and institutions will discuss the best ways to nurture and capitalize on innovation and reveal the latest global trends.” Other attendees will be former New York mayor Rudolph Giuliani, Australian Prime Minister John Howard, former NSW Premier Bob Carr and, controversially, Steve Forbes, president and chief executive officer of Forbes Inc, and one of the signers of the Statement of Principles of Project for the New American Century.

Mr Knobloch of the 30A network described the attendees as “a few hundred neo-conservative corporate chiefs”. An article written by James Goodman and hosted on the 30A network website alleges a connection between Mr Forbes, the Bush family, and the policies of the administration of George W. Bush.

“Ironically enough, Forbes now leads the charge in the US business world against the ‘Axis of Evil’ (which of course includes Iran). Backing the US ‘War on Terror’ to the hilt, Forbes is one of Bush’s key business sponsors. In January 2004 it proudly announced ‘Bush is Best’,” the article said.

The 30A network is organising a protest in Sydney to coincide with the conference. It is not yet known if the ASIO risk assessment for the event will change as a result of Mr Bush attending.

Answers To Frequently Asked Car Insurance Questions

By Joe R. Maldonado

Here are two of the more common car insurance questions answered:

‘What is taxable as far as car insurance?’

In general, any claim settlements made against your car insurance will not be taxable. However, you could receive payments for things like repairing or replacing your car, medical expenses or replacement services such as housekeeping or child care. These payments would be designed to give you compensation and restore you to the place where you were before the accident occurred. You cannot deduct the loss of your income though, because your insurance company will have already compensated you for this.

You may sometimes have to report a settlement as income, and this will be taxable. You should do this if you received anything above the amount needed to repair the damage. You would just report the excess. This is also true for settlements involving bodily injury and rehabilitation.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BjB2SrKZ9QA[/youtube]

Always remain compliant with the IRS. Report what you receive, even when it isn’t taxable. Just make sure you report it as income.

Go ahead and get some help from a professional. You may have a unique situation that requires looking at. There may be different rules which apply to your situation.

Here is another one of the most commonly asked car insurance questions:

‘Does my credit rating affect the cost of my car insurance?’

The way in which you handle your bills does actually affect your car insurance premiums.

If you miss a few payments on your credit cards or any other bills your credit score will suffer. This can raise your insurance premiums by as much as 50%! Upon application, your credit gets evaluated by the insurance agency. They will use the information that they find to determine the rate of your insurance premium.

The whole idea here is that they hold a general belief that a person who is responsible with their money will also be a responsible driver. Insurance companies have had experience enough to know that this generally turns out to be the truth.

Many times those who hold an above average credit rating will also be the same people that install anti-theft devices on their cars as well as cautiously follow the rules of the road. These are also the people who will be the most likely to put on their seatbelts before hitting the road.

If you have a bad credit rating, you will be viewed as high risk. This does not just apply to the rules of the road. The insurance agencies also view you as someone who may end up filing an unnecessary claim or trying to quote a claim that is above your actual loss. This is why you have got to be meticulous when it comes to your credit score. Car insurance is not the only area of your life that this will affect. Be careful when it comes to making late payments on anything, and avoid bankruptcy and foreclosure at all costs.

These are just a couple of the frequently asked car insurance questions, and you can find the answers to many more of them with a simple online search.

About the Author: Next, find out more about

car insurance questions

in the best specialized website available on such delicate topic.

Source:

isnare.com

Permanent Link:

isnare.com/?aid=753811&ca=Finances

Painting Contractors Have Certain Techniques To Save Time And Improve The Finish

byAlma Abell

Technology changes at a very rapid pace, we most certainly see this is domestic appliances, communication, automobiles, etc; if even has an impact on exterior painting contractors. The methods used to apply the base cost and finish coat have changed, so has the coating materials. Having an understanding of the new techniques and new products that are available for professional painters helps the average homeowner to understand better what is needed to get the best and the longest lasting exterior paint job.

The sprayer:

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0tON0ZVU-rE[/youtube]

In the past exterior painting contractors did everything with a brush and roller, today, although these basic tools are still used extensively, it is the introduction of sprayers that have had the biggest impact on the business. A power sprayer, either powered by electricity or compressed air has numerous advantages for the painter and you, the homeowner.

Save time: The biggest reason behind the rapid increase in the use of sprayers is time savings. It is almost impossible to compare painting the exterior of a house with a sprayer compared to the traditional brush and roller approach. It makes the completion of an exterior painting job a matter of days rather than weeks and they finished results are better. Don’t think for a minute that using a sprayer means sacrificing quality, it is rather the opposite; the finished surface is smoother, the coat is more uniform and there are fewer runs and surface blemishes.

Save money: The use of sprayers by exterior painting contractors not only saves time, it saves money. To do a proper job using brushes and rollers might take several weeks, when the job is done using a sprayer this becomes several days. The time savings is considerable, when the contractor uses a sprayer he does not have to dedicate as many painters to the job, this saves him and you money in labor.

No matter how good the contractor is, brushes will still be used. All the trim around the doors and windows as well as the gutters and downspouts are still best when done by hand. A power sprayer is fast, however, no power sprayer will ever be as accurate as professional exterior painting contractors. Hand painting is also a must when a certain spot or a certain area on the surface needs the benefit of a second primer coat to fight previous water damage or wood deterioration of some sort.

If you are looking for exterior painting contractors that do the job right and do it right the first time then you are welcome to contact Tri-State Coating, Inc. the award winning dealer of Rhino Shield in Indiana, Ohio and Kentucky.

Florida man charged with stealing Wi-Fi

Update since publication

This article mentions that Wi-Fi stands for “Wireless Fidelity”, although this is disputed.

Thursday, July 7, 2005

A Florida man is being charged with 3rd degree felony for logging into a private Wi-Fi (Wireless Fidelity) Internet access point without permission. Benjamin Smith III, 41, is set for a pre-trial hearing this month in the first case of its kind in the United States.

This kind of activity occurs frequently, but often goes undetected by the owners of these wireless access points (WAPs). Unauthorized users range from casual Web browsers, to users sending e-mails, to users involved in pornography or even illegal endeavours.

According to Richard Dinon, owner of the WAP Smith allegedly broke into, Smith was using a laptop in an automobile while parked outside Dinon’s residence.

There are many steps an owner of one of these access points can take to secure them from outside users. Dinon reportedly knew how to take these steps, but had not bothered because his “neighbors are older.”

Scientists analyse effects of global warming, atmospheric ozone on crops

Monday, July 28, 2014

A research team from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Colorado State University of the US and the University of Sheffield of the UK has analysed effects of global warming and ozone pollution over 2000–2050 on the worldwide production of wheat, rice, maize and soybean. The study was published in journal Nature Climate Change yesterday.

The scientists found reduction of crop yields by 2050 exceeded 10% of 2000 levels, substantially decreasing food security, in all cases examined. Several scenarios were considered because of uncertainty of future levels of ozone pollution.They estimated by 2050, increasing population and changing diet would increase world food needs by 50 percent.As coauthor Colette Heald told The Huffington Post, “The climate projections are quite consistent […] the future of ozone pollution is very different […] leading to either offsetting or reinforcing effects [of climate change] on crops”.By 2050, undernourishment would increase by either 49 percent or by 27 percent, depending on the scenario.

The study focuses on ozone–temperature covariation: ground-level ozone increases with temperatures.Heald said although temperature and ozone are separately known to impact crop yields, “nobody has looked at these together”.Depending on region and crops, the yields may be primarily sensitive to ozone —in the case of wheat— or heat —in the case of maize— alone, providing a local estimation of relative benefits of climate change adaptation versus ozone regulation.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture notes, “Ground-level ozone causes more damage to plants than all other air pollutants combined”, highlighting the importance of air quality for agriculture. Results of NCLAN studies, published in a paper by AS Heagle in 1989, show dicot species, such as soybean, cotton, and peanut, lose more yield from ozone than do monocot species such as sorghum, field corn, and winter wheat.The researchers found that ozone pollution caused 46 percent of previously heat-attributed damage to soybean crops.

The model does not include the effect of rising carbon dioxide concentration, which has complex and potentially offsetting impacts on global food supply.The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency says some crops may have higher yields with increased levels of carbon dioxide.However, global warming also increases probability of extreme crops-damaging weather events such as floods, droughts, and extreme temperatures. Climate change affects distribution of weeds, pests, and diseases.Heald noted the findings show pollution reduction is also important. “An air-quality cleanup would improve crop yields […] Ozone is something that we understand the causes of, and the steps that need to be taken to improve air quality.”

As Heald told The Huffington Post, US surface ozone has dropped partly due to the Clean Air Act. “Despite an increase in vehicle miles driven and energy consumption, surface ozone has declined by 25 percent on average across the U.S. from 1980 to 2012 […] However, the future of ozone air quality in the U.S. and around the world will depend on local emissions, the use of pollution control technology, regulations, and air quality policy.”

The study was supported by the Croucher Foundation, US National Science Foundation, and US National Park Service.

Elizabeth II annuls Fred Goodwin knighthood

Tuesday, January 31, 2012

Queen Elizabeth II, the British monarch, has today withdrawn and annulled a knighthood given to Fred Goodwin in 2004, heeding the advice given to her by a forfeiture committee. Goodwin is the former chief executive at the Royal Bank of Scotland Group (RBS) and was awarded his knighthood by the British government of the time for services to banking. The committee concluded “that widespread concerns about Fred Goodwin’s decision meant that the retention of a knighthood for services to banking could not be sustained.”

Goodwin was chief executive of RBS when they purchased ABN AMRO, a Netherlands bank, in 2007. The British government subsequently bailed out RBS for £45 billion, amidst the late-2000s financial crisis.

British prime minister David Cameron stated about the annulment: “The proper process has been followed and I think we’ve ended up with the right decision.” Cameron and Ed Miliband, UK Leader of the Opposition, both believed Goodwin’s knighthood should be removed. Miliband called it “the start of the change we need in our boardrooms.”

Liberal Democrat leader and Deputy PM Nick Clegg considered it to be the “right decision”. “[A]ppropriate” was the word George Osborne, Chancellor of the Exchequer used to describe it. “RBS came to symbolise everything that went wrong in the British economy in the last decade,” Osborne stated. Alex Salmond, First Minister of Scotland stated the title was given “for services to banking which could not therefore be sustained”, calling the decision “correct”.

Goodwin does not have the right to appeal against the decision, nor had the right to provide the forfeiture committee with any representations. The monarch holds sole responsibility for withdrawing all knighthoods; on this occasion Elizabeth II followed the advice of the committee, who decided to recommend the withdrawal to her. The Cabinet Office announced the advice had been given to the queen on the understanding that “Goodwin had brought the honours system in to disrepute”.

Speaking of the “exceptional case”, the committee explained: “In 2008, the government had to provide £20 billion of new equity to recapitalise RBS and ensure its survival and prevent the collapse of confidence in the British banking system. Subsequent increases in government capital have brought the total necessary injection of taxpayers’ money in RBS to £45.5 billion.” The committee understood that “Fred Goodwin was the dominant decision maker at RBS at the time.”

Until this announcement, criminal conviction and professional expulsion were the only causes for which individuals had their knighthoods revoked.